🧭 Overview: What Is CentralReach?
CentralReach is the most widely adopted platform in the ABA services market, offering an all-in-one solution that combines practice management, clinical documentation, scheduling, billing, payroll, and reporting. It is used by over 200,000 professionals, and has become the default operating system for many ABA providers.
🧠 Core Capabilities
Break down by module or function:
Practice Management
Scheduling (ScheduleAI)
Billing & Claims (ClaimCheckAI, ARAgent)
Payroll integration
HRIS/employee tracking (limited)
Clinical Management
Data collection for BCBAs/RBTs
Supervision tracking
Parent training workflows
Session notes (now AI-assisted)
Analytics & Reporting
Insights data warehouse (with performance and field limitations)
ABI Tool (used more often by smaller providers)
Limited historical data tracking unless augmented
AI Add-Ons
NoteGuardAI: Clinical Session Notes Auditing
ScheduleAI: Appointment optimization using provider/location data
ClaimCheckAI: AI-powered review of claims prior to submission
ARAgent: Focused on payor-side revenue cycle management
📈 Acquisition by Roper (March 2025 - See Scott’s Deep Dive here)
Roper to acquire CentralReach for $1.65B, including a $200M tax benefit
CR expected to generate $175M in revenue and $75M EBITDA by mid-2026
Roper expects 20%+ organic growth
CentralReach joins Roper’s Application Software segment
This move validates ABA’s position as a maturing healthcare technology market — but also signals that pricing pressure and investor expectations may rise.
🌐 Ecosystem Fit
✅ Strengths
End-to-end platform built for ABA
Deep adoption among the largest providers
High retention and workflow depth
Expanding AI investments
⚠️ Limitations
Pricing remains a top concern for customers
Clinical UX is often criticized by therapists
Limited flexibility with integrations
Reporting and data access can be difficult for enterprise teams
🔄 Integration Needs (often handled externally)
HR/ATS: Greenhouse, iCIMS, ADP, Apploi
CRM: Salesforce, HubSpot, LeadSquared
Clinical Tools: VB-Mapp, Q-Global
Training: Relias, internal LMS
Credentialing: Symplr
Financials: Sage Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics
💬 Customer Sentiment
Based on hundreds of conversations with providers:
Mission-critical, but often not loved
Complaints often center around cost, clinical usability, and lack of openness
Yet few providers leave — due to feature breadth and migration complexity
🔮 What to Watch Next
Can CR improve data structure and API flexibility to unlock broader AI use cases?
Will it pursue acquisitions or partnerships to shore up clinical experience?
How will pricing evolve under Roper’s growth expectations?
Can CR become the “data hub” of the ABA enterprise, or will it stay focused on its own modules?